know that I usually deal with frivolous arguments and mental drain on the meager pages of my poor, neglected and, more recently, blogs. But today I open a parenthesis in defense of himself and all those little expressions of creativity, expression and freedom that are now what I think the best part of the media revolution brought by the www in the last 10 years. Personally, I feel enriched by this little space at the service of all bloggers, not so much for what I have, how to use that many other people, especially friends, have made in recent times. How does the phrase in my opening image of this page: "Who would not want a little 'more room? "(with a view of the Atlantic, the Ocean Drive in Newport), I always saw this little corner of the web as an opportunity that certainly does not change the world, but along with many others mm of wire is the social fabric of our day. Without going to look for blogs on the net social, political, those involved, those that have some kind of service more or less useful, I will simply say that these spaces have enabled me to do and learn a lot in recent months. I've shared pictures and emotions with my friends, I knew many of the thousand little things of life or travel Deputy English Cescon. I could talk, frivolity with my friends and I could compare di Parma different opinions of people who otherwise would never find in the same room to discuss. Little things that would never enter the sphere of my knowledge, taking off something at the level of contact. It 's true human contact, physical, does not exist, but this "modern world" that takes away the time chatting with a friend, a call to share an experience, on the other hand, in some way, we gives the opportunity to reconnect, to show, to think and to get closer to something or someone who is thousands of miles away, or maybe 100 meters from us, but for which we do not usually know a review. The bill passed by the Senate on Feb. 5 could silence all these little voices. I do not want to enter the political merit of the story, the motives which led to this point, as I will not argue the fact that in every opportunity there is someone who sees the hand and the destructive or constructive, as the subject of this story who would like to use the www for "crimes of incitement to murder and condoning of crime", to quote a portion of the bill in question. I think that this law would not solve the problem at its root, while bringing little disruption to the daily routines of a lot of users. In a web where, according to statistics, 90% of sites are still in porn, I do not think that the closure of private blogs and opinion would move much more than the balance in the use of the network.
follow the link that covers this topic in detail and with a sacrosanct political posting, so everyone can draw their own conclusions freely e-policy.it
